Evidence,
Not
Guesswork

AutoBench delivers dynamic, collective-judge evaluations so labs and enterprises can choose the right LLM with confidence, speed, and clear cost–quality trade-offs.

Our mission

Help labs and enterprises choose the right LLM for the job, faster, cheaper, and with evidence you can trust. AutoBench turns evaluation into a repeatable system that keeps pace with the model race, using Collective-LLM-as-a-Judge to deliver rankings aligned with gold-standard benchmarks.

Why AutoBench exists

Static leaderboards get gamed. Human reviews are slow, subjective, and expensive. Meanwhile, new models land every week, making ad-hoc trials impossible to scale. AutoBench offers a dynamic, automated alternative that generates fresh questions, lets models judge each other, and converges to stable rankings, so you can make procurement and product calls with confidence.

How it works

AutoBench runs end-to-end LLM evaluations on your topics and use cases. In a typical pass, we generate questions across domains (logic, coding, history, science, creative writing), collect answers from the models you select, and compute a consensus ranking that's strongly correlated with human-driven benchmarks like Chatbot Arena and MMLU, delivered in hours, not weeks.

  • 01

    Select models & domains

    Bring any mix of commercial, open-source, or proprietary endpoints.

  • 02

    Auto-generate Q&A

    Fresh, difficulty-balanced prompts each run (no test-set memorization).

  • 03

    Collective-judge loop

    Multiple LLMs score and weight peers; ranks stabilize iteratively.

  • 04

    Decision-ready output

    Download CSVs and dashboards for quality, cost, and latency trade-offs.

AutoBench is a global team serving customers worldwide. Our platform and support operate across time zones to match your release cycles.

What makes us different

Collective-LLM-as-a-Judge

Models judge each other to dilute single-model bias and reflect the state of the ecosystem.

Dynamic by design

New prompts every run resist benchmark gaming and stay relevant as capabilities shift.

Proven alignment

Correlates ~80% with established standards (e.g., ~83% vs Chatbot Arena, ~75% vs MMLU, ~79% vs AAQI).

Speed & efficiency

A 20-model sweep with 267 questions has been delivered in ~7 hours—with results that track human-curated leaderboards.

How we work with you

Managed runs

We operate the benchmark for you (private to your data and endpoints) and deliver decision-ready reports.

In-cloud deployment

Prefer to run it yourself? Set it up in your environment and plug in your model list.

AutoBench your models today

We invite you to explore the code, run the benchmark, contribute to its development, and join the discussion on the future of LLM evaluation. Explore our resources on Hugging Face.

Contact us

Our Partners

Translated LogoDIAG Sapienza Logo

Let's talk now!

By clicking "Submit" you declare that you have accepted the site's privacy policy.